[Ur] Functional infix operators ?

[Sergey Mironov]

Thanks, Gabriel!
I've followed your instructions (see both patches in attach, ready to
`hg import`). Test program seems to work with both of them. I'll test
your second approach more intensively soon.

Regards,
Sergey

2015-02-22 19:08 GMT+03:00 Gabriel Riba <griba2001 at gmail.com>:
> Gabriel Riba <griba2001 <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>>
>> *** To the operators associativity commands, before (%left ANDALSO)
>>
>>   %left BACKTICK_PATH
>>
>
> Doubts about the precedence.
>
> Maybe we should place the precedence for BACKTICK_PATH, application and
> composition operators after the logical ones, after ORELSE or even after the
> following COLON (operator for signature annotation of expressions).
>
> The boss should decide it.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ur mailing list
> Ur at impredicative.com
> http://www.impredicative.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ur
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 1_of_1_Add_support_for__a_func_b__infix_notation.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2077 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.impredicative.com/pipermail/ur/attachments/20150225/b07eb7bc/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 1_of_1_Add_support_for__a_func_b__infix_notation__Ver_2_.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2912 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.impredicative.com/pipermail/ur/attachments/20150225/b07eb7bc/attachment-0001.bin>