Comparison tables

From Impredicative Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Added notes section)
(how to update this page)

Revision as of 03:40, 18 December 2011

A comparison between Ur/Web and some other functional programming frameworks.

To update this page if you don't have an account on this wiki, email Robin Green. Or create an account.

Part 1

Framework Documentation Commercial support License Programming language(s) Standard execution model Free of garbage collection overhead
Ur/Web Yes Yes Ur/Web Native code Yes
OPA Yes OPA
Play with Scala module Yes Yes Scala JVM No
Lift Incomplete Yes
Yesod Haskell Native code No
Happstack

Part 2

Framework "Stateless" CSRF protection Javascript code generation FRP-like client-side code Type-safe SQL Type-safe metaprogramming MVC-based
Ur/Web Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Optional
OPA
Play with Scala module Yes No Yes
Lift Low-level only
Yesod
Happstack

Notes

It is not really worth trying to measure "maturity" here, as none of the frameworks on this page have seen huge takeup thus far, and in any case it should be remembered that a "mature" web framework is not necessarily a modern or well-designed one.

The Programming language(s) heading refers to the programming language(s) (and, for the avoidance of doubt, template language(s)) that the developers using the framework are expected to program in (excluding Javascript, if applicable), not the programming language(s) that the framework is implemented in.

Stateless means that no state is no retained in the application server (as opposed to the database, or the web browser) between requests.

Personal tools